The Data

The numbers behind the discount.

Drawn from a database of 2,566 LATAM deep tech ventures (data cutoff March 2025), benchmarked against global sources. Every figure links back to the report.

Showing figures current to July 22, 2026.

The capital gap

How little reaches the region, and how fast that is changing.

Per-capita deep tech investment
USD per capita
United States$153
Europe$31
Latin America$15
Asia$3

LATAM invests half of Europe’s level and a tenth of the United States’, per person, in USD.

As originally publishedAs of September 2024Report p.40

As published in the report, September 2025.

SourcesLatin American Dynamism Project (LADP), Accelerating Deep Tech in Latin America; Inter-American Development Bank (IDB Lab), Deep Tech: The New Wave; Sling Hub & Itaú, LATAM Startup Market 2024 in Review; Atomico, State of European Tech Report 2024

Methodology: LADP calculation from cumulative regional deep tech investment ÷ population. ledger #67: denominators are inconsistent (Asia = continent, Europe ≈ EU). Recompute with stated population bases before refreshing.

Cumulative investment by region
USD billions
United States$52.0B
Europe$14.0B
Asia$13.0B
Latin America$2.5B

In absolute terms the gap is starker still: roughly USD 2.5bn for all of LATAM.

As originally publishedAs of September 2024Report p.40

As published in the report, September 2025.

SourcesInter-American Development Bank (IDB Lab), Deep Tech: The New Wave; Dealroom.co, Deep Tech in Europe, Dealroom Deep Dive

Methodology: Cumulative-to-Sept-2024 per Science|Business. ledger #65. NOT refreshed to a comparable current series ON PURPOSE: public 2025 figures use incompatible deep tech taxonomies (Tracxn US ~$179bn vs Dealroom Europe $20.3bn, not comparable) and refreshing across them would repeat the report's own error. Scale anchor for the chart caption: Europe alone was $20.3bn of ANNUAL deep tech VC in 2025 (Dealroom), against the report's $14bn CUMULATIVE, so label units explicitly and treat the four bars as a 2024 cumulative snapshot, not a live comparison. Global deep tech ~$250bn in 2025; US ~45% of deals, Europe ~30%, Asia >20%.

From $300m to a 20× horizon
USD billions, cumulative
$0.00B$1.00B$2.00B$3.00B201920232024
20×projected by 2032

Investment grew ~600% between 2019 and 2023, reaching USD 2.5bn by late 2024. The BID projects a 20× expansion of the ecosystem by 2032.

As originally publishedAs of September 2024Report p.41

As published in the report, September 2025.

SourcesInter-American Development Bank (IDB Lab), Deep Tech: The New Wave; Sling Hub & Itaú, LATAM Startup Market 2024 in Review; Latin American Dynamism Project (LADP), Accelerating Deep Tech in Latin America

Methodology: Cumulative LATAM deep tech investment. ledger #63/#64: extend through FY2025 and H1-2026; the $2.54bn endpoint mixes an annual flow into a cumulative stock.

LATAM venture funding, all tech
USD billions
$0.0B$2.0B$4.0B$6.0B$8.0B2023202420252026

The recovery the report only saw the start of. 2026 is the first half annualised, not an actual. All technology, not deep tech alone.

Verified against the primary sourceAs of July 2026

Not in the published report. Added since.

SourcesDealroom.co, Latin America, Dealroom Deep Dive; LAVCA (Association for Private Capital Investment in Latin America), 2025 Latin American Startup Ecosystem Insights; LAVCA, 2026 LAVCA Trends in Tech

Methodology: NEW refresh dataset. LATAM all-tech VC by year (Dealroom Deep Dive series for consistency). 2026 is H1 $3.1bn actual → $6.2bn full-year projection (projected:true). LAVCA equity-only figures run lower (~$4.1bn 2025); the gap is debt/structured instruments, see methodology.md. Not deep-tech-specific.

Who funds the research
business-funded share of R&D (%)
Latin America35%
United States & Europe60%
China80%

Business covers about 35% of R&D in Latin America, against 60% or more across the United States and Europe and nearly 80% in China. Thin private research funding is a structural brake on deep tech.

As originally publishedAs of 2019Report p.48

As published in the report, September 2025.

SourcesECLAC / CEPAL, Ciencia, tecnología e innovación: cooperación, integración y desafíos regionales (LC/TS.2022/156); UNESCO Institute for Statistics (UIS), 2026 R&D Data Release

Methodology: ECLAC Graph I.3, 2019 data (ledger #75/#97). us-eu government = 25 is the midpoint of the report's "20–30" range. Superseded framing: UIS 2026 gives LAC R&D at 0.57% of GDP vs 1.92% global, a stronger level comparison than this composition split.

Corporate VC into LATAM deep tech
USD millions
$0.0M$50.0M$100.0M$150.0M2020202220232024

Corporate venture capital into the region’s deep tech peaked at USD 119M in 2022, then cooled with the wider funding market. The base is set for the CVC Bridge the report proposes.

As originally publishedAs of 2024Report p.90

As published in the report, September 2025.

SourceDealroom.co, Deep Tech Overview: Latin America

Methodology: Dealroom LATAM deep tech CVC (ledger #127). 2021 is "n/a" in the report (null). Fell 70% from the 2022 peak but still 4× the 2020 base, present the full series, not just the 4×. Needs 2025/H1-2026 extension.

Deep tech capital raised since the report
$30MGRIDX Fund II
$50MDraper Cygnus
$17,500MChina NVCGF (committed)

A partial, sourced list of vehicles committed or launched since September 2025. Note the asymmetry: the two LATAM-facing funds together are USD 80m against China’s USD 17.5bn already committed out of a USD 138bn vehicle.

Verified against the primary sourceAs of July 2026

Not in the published report. Added since.

SourcesScenius LATAM (via LinkedIn), GridX: The Matchmaker for Scientists & Business; Inter-American Development Bank (IDB Lab), IDB Lab Approves Investment to Boost Deeptech Ventures in Latin America (GridX Fund II, RG-Q0095); The Quantum Insider, China Launches $138 Billion Government-Backed Venture Fund, Includes Quantum Startups; The State Council, People's Republic of China, China unveils national venture capital guidance fund to boost innovation

Methodology: NEW. Deep tech capital vehicles committed/launched since the report (Sept 2025). Partial, sourced list. amountUsdM in USD millions; the China figure is committed-to-date of a much larger 20-year vehicle.

The ecosystem

Where the ventures are, what they build, and where they stall.

A highly concentrated map
ventures mapped
Brazil1,04840.8%
Mexico35814%
Argentina25610%
Chile2519.8%
Colombia2198.5%
Rest of LATAM43416.9%

Brazil hosts 41% of the region’s ventures, more than the next four countries combined. The “Big 5” account for 83% of everything mapped.

As originally publishedAs of March 2025Report p.25

As published in the report, September 2025.

SourcesLatin American Dynamism Project (LADP), Accelerating Deep Tech in Latin America; Tracxn Technologies, Tracxn, LATAM deep tech company database (LADP extract); EMERGE (Emerge Brasil) & Cubo Itaú, Radar Deep Tech LATAM 2025

Methodology: LADP/Tracxn count and share. ledger #25/#26: EMERGE's independent mapping disagrees sharply (Brazil 72.3% vs 40.8%; different rank order). Neither is "the" number, a definitional gap, not an error.

LATAM deep tech by sector
share of ventures
Biotechnology61%
Artificial Intelligence11%
Nanotechnology6%
Cleantech5%
Spacetech4%
Advanced Mobility4%
Robotics2%
Advanced Manufacturing2%
Healthtech2%
Advanced Materials1%
Medical Devices & Others1%

Biotechnology and AI alone account for 72% of mapped ventures, a reflection of the region’s biological-sciences talent and biodiversity.

As originally publishedAs of 2023Report p.30

Re-checked against a current source. Unchanged from the published report. (EMERGE (Emerge Brasil) & Cubo Itaú)

SourcesInter-American Development Bank (IDB Lab), Deep Tech: The New Wave; EMERGE (Emerge Brasil) & Cubo Itaú, Radar Deep Tech LATAM 2025

  • The report prints "<1%"; charted at its upper bound. Named sectors sum to 99%.

Methodology: IDB 2023 sector split by COMPANY COUNT, CONFIRMED still current by EMERGE Radar 2025 (biotech 61% / AI 11% both editions). But it measures the stock, not the flow: see the new `aiMomentum` dataset, AI is 11% of companies yet ~70% of rounds by 2023–2025 vintage. Pair the two on the site (ledger #42).

The scale-up funnel
$0.6M median round
$8.3M median round
$17M median round

The ecosystem is front-loaded: 72% of ventures sit at Seed, only 19% reach Series A, and just 22 (10%) have raised Series B or beyond. Median ticket sizes jump an order of magnitude at each stage.

As originally publishedAs of March 2025Report p.28

As published in the report, September 2025.

SourcesLatin American Dynamism Project (LADP), Accelerating Deep Tech in Latin America; Tracxn Technologies, Tracxn, LATAM deep tech company database (LADP extract); Inter-American Development Bank (IDB Lab), Deep Tech: The New Wave

Methodology: Share of ventures by stage (LADP/Tracxn) with median ticket in USD m. ledger #35: the report text (10%, "22 startups") contradicts this chart's Series-B share (9%).

Where 2024 funding went
share of total tech funding (%)
Fintech55%
Energy13%
Deep tech6%
Other verticals26%

Deep tech took 6% of Latin America’s tech funding in 2024, USD 536M of USD 8.8bn. Fintech still dominates the total, but deep tech’s share is climbing.

As originally publishedAs of 2024Report p.43

As published in the report, September 2025.

SourcesSling Hub & Itaú, LATAM Startup Market 2024 in Review; Dealroom.co, Latin America, Dealroom Deep Dive

Methodology: Total funding share 2024. Report names fintech 55, energy 13, deep tech 6; "other" 26 is the remainder to 100. Fintech ~58% at LTM Q2-2026 (Dealroom), persists (ledger #71).

Equity funding tells a sharper story
share of equity funding (%)
Fintech41%
Deep tech11%
Energy11%
Other verticals37%

By equity funding, deep tech reaches 11%, level with energy and second only to fintech. Investors are already putting real ownership behind the sector.

As originally publishedAs of 2024Report p.43

As published in the report, September 2025.

SourceSling Hub & Itaú, LATAM Startup Market 2024 in Review

Methodology: Equity funding share 2024 (ledger #74). Report names fintech 41, deep tech 11, energy 11; "other" 37 is the remainder.

The discount

The mispricing the report sets out to close.

The LATAM Discount
valuation gap (%)
−48.4%vs. the world
historical average−13.9%
vs. emerging markets−22.9%
vs. the world−48.4%

Latin American assets trade far below global and emerging-market peers, and well beyond the historical average. The report’s core claim: this is a solvable mispricing.

Verified against the primary sourceAs of June 30, 2026Report p.45

Refreshed June 30, 2026, MSCI.

SourcesMSCI, MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America Index (USD), Index Factsheet; Itaú BBA Equity Strategy Team, Latam & Brazil Equity Strategy: Thematic Book

Methodology: REFRESHED. Price-to-book discount computed from the MSCI EM Latin America Index factsheet, 30 Jun 2026: LATAM P/BV 1.99 vs ACWI 3.86 = −48.4% (world); vs EM P/BV 2.58 = −22.9%. Narrowed from the Itaú BBA 2024 read (−51% / −27.7%) after LATAM rallied +55.67% in 2025 (ledger #77/#78). Still a market figure that moves daily, asOf is the factsheet date.

MSCI EM Latin America, annual return
per cent
−40.00%−20.00%0.00%+20.00%+40.00%+60.00%20222023202420252026

Why the discount narrowed. A 55.67% year in 2025 re-rated the region, closing the gap to the world from -51% to -48.4%. 2026 is year to date. This is the report’s "temporary mispricing" thesis partly playing out.

Verified against the primary sourceAs of June 30, 2026

Not in the published report. Added since.

SourceMSCI, MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America Index (USD), Index Factsheet

Methodology: NEW. Annual gross index return. Explains the discount narrowing, +55.67% in 2025 re-rated LATAM. 2026 is YTD (ytd:true).

The turn

Momentum has already begun to build.

The fastest-growing sector in the region
+219%Deep tech funding growth
+189%Equity funding growth
+37%Overall tech rebound
4×Corporate VC growth (2020–24)

In 2024 deep tech outgrew every other tech vertical in LATAM, by funding and by equity.

As originally publishedAs of 2024Report p.43

As published in the report, September 2025.

SourcesSling Hub & Itaú, LATAM Startup Market 2024 in Review; Dealroom.co, Deep Tech Overview: Latin America

Methodology: YoY 2024-over-2023 growth (Sling Hub) plus CVC 4× (Dealroom, ledger #76/#127). Two cycles old; refresh to FY2025.

AI: 11% of the companies, 70% of the money
per cent
Share of companies11%
Share of recent rounds70%

The single biggest change since the report. The sector split by company count barely moved, but AI-core companies founded 2023-2025 took roughly seven in ten of the rounds their cohorts closed. Stock and flow now tell different stories.

Verified against the primary sourceAs of 2025

Not in the published report. Added since.

SourcesEMERGE (Emerge Brasil) & Cubo Itaú, Radar Deep Tech LATAM 2025; Dealroom.co, Latin America, Dealroom Deep Dive; Inter-American Development Bank (IDB Lab), Deep Tech: The New Wave

Methodology: NEW, the AI breakout the report lacks (ledger #42). Stock share 11% (stable since IDB 2023); recent-flow share ~70% of rounds by 2023–2025-founded companies. Resolves the report's own tension: it expanded its database to AI/crypto because they grew, then charted a pre-growth sector split.

The benchmark

What a coordinated push looks like elsewhere.

What a coordinated push looks like
15%of tech investment in 2017
71%by 2022
$138Bstate-backed deep tech fund (2025)

China shows the other end of the spectrum: deep tech leapt from 15% to 71% of domestic tech investment in five years, backed by a USD 138bn state fund.

As originally publishedAs of March 2025Report p.101

Re-checked against a current source. Unchanged from the published report. (The State Council, People's Republic of China)

SourcesGlobal Private Capital Association (GPCA), 2023 Emerging Trends in Asia; The Quantum Insider, China Launches $138 Billion Government-Backed Venture Fund, Includes Quantum Startups; The State Council, People's Republic of China, China unveils national venture capital guidance fund to boost innovation

Methodology: Deep tech share 15%→71% of domestic tech investment (GPCA, 2017–2022). $138bn fund confirmed (ledger #149); ~$17.5bn now committed across three regional funds (new since the report). Newer context (not charted): China = 66% of Asia tech funding in 2024, down slightly from 69% in 2023; Chinese deep tech ~$6.2bn/241 rounds to Dec-2024, −26% in 2025; AI ~$10–11bn/yr since 2024 vs a 2021 peak of $23.3bn. fundUsdBn is USD bn. The 19.2% CAGR is excluded here and carried separately as a vendor forecast (ledger #144).

Projected deep tech growth, to 2034
CAGR (%)
Australia & NZ22.0%
China19.2%
United States15.6%

China’s deep tech market is projected to compound at 19.2% a year through 2034, outpacing the United States and trailing only Australia & New Zealand.

Estimate, read the methodology noteAs of December 31, 2024Report p.102

SourcesFuture Market Insights, Deep Tech Market Report; Global Private Capital Association (GPCA), 2023 Emerging Trends in Asia

Methodology: Vendor forecast. China’s 19.2% CAGR through 2034 is a Future Market Insights projection; the US (15.6%) and Australia & NZ (22%) comparison points are as cited by GPCA. Treat as an estimate, not a verified figure.

China’s deep tech bets shifted
private capital, 2022 (USD bn)
Biotech$10.0B
EV / AV / Automotive$11.1B

Biotech investment in China fell from ~$22bn to $10bn by 2022 while EV, autonomous and automotive rose from $7.9bn to $11.1bn, capital rotating toward strategic hardware. Bars show 2022; the table carries both years.

As originally publishedAs of 2022Report p.102

As published in the report, September 2025.

SourceGlobal Private Capital Association (GPCA), 2023 Emerging Trends in Asia

Methodology: GPCA 2023 (ledger #145/#146). biotech peak ≈22 (pre-2022) → 10 in 2022; EV/AV/auto 7.9 → 11.1, overtaking biotech. Four-year-old endpoint.

Corporates are leaning in
2.8×Overall corporate venturing growth
4.2×Corporate–deep tech collaborations
71%Of firms expect deep tech to grow in their portfolio

Global corporate venturing grew 2.8× and corporate–deep tech collaborations 4.2×; 71% of firms expect deep tech to weigh more in their portfolios.

As originally publishedAs of 2021Report p.89

As published in the report, September 2025.

SourceIESE Business School, Open Innovation: How Corporate Giants Can Better Collaborate with Deep-Tech Start-ups

Methodology: IESE 2021 (ledger #122). Multipliers over 2017–2021, not a time series. New context: LATAM CVC activity doubled 2020–2023 and AI is now the leading LATAM CVC theme (41% of funds), not in the report.

The evidence

What the data says about the risk everyone assumes.

The case against the deep-tech-is-riskier reflex
Do deep tech companies fail more often?NoFailure rates match regular tech.
Do they need more time to exit?NoExit timelines match regular tech.
Do they have larger exits?InconclusiveLarge outliers exist; the sample is still too thin to call.

Hello Tomorrow’s European dataset finds deep tech ventures fail no more often and exit no slower than regular tech. Whether their exits are larger is still inconclusive.

As originally publishedAs of January 1, 2025Report p.24

SourceHello Tomorrow, Deep Tech Investor Mapping (LATAM) & The 2025 European Deep Tech Report

The endowment

The raw inputs the region already holds.

Why the region is primed
42%Biodiversity
58%Lithium resources
65%Renewable electricity
865kSTEM researchers

The raw inputs for frontier science are abundant: biodiversity, lithium, clean power and a deep pool of researchers.

As originally publishedAs of 2025Report p.23

Re-checked against a current source. Unchanged from the published report. (Ember)

SourcesUN Environment Programme / World Economic Forum, Latin America & the Caribbean biodiversity share (UNEP / WEF / IDB); U.S. Geological Survey, Mineral Commodity Summaries 2026, Lithium; Ember, Global Electricity Review 2026; UNESCO Institute for Statistics (UIS), 2026 R&D Data Release; RICYT (Ibero-American Network of Science and Technology Indicators), Science, Technology and Innovation in Latin America, the Caribbean and Ibero-America in 2024

  • Share of global lithium RESOURCES, not reserves. The report says "reserves"; that is an error (ledger #2).
  • Carry as a ~700–865k headcount range, not a point value: RICYT reports "exceeding 700 thousand" (2024) against the IDB's 865k. FTE runs materially lower than headcount (ledger #4).

Methodology: renewables 65% CONFIRMED (Ember GER 2026). biodiversity 42% is within the established range, UNEP/WEF cite ~40% of global biodiversity (up to ~60% of terrestrial life on a broader measure); keep 42% with the range noted (ledger #1). lithium 58% is RESOURCES not reserves (ledger #2). researchers 865k → carry as ~700–865k range (RICYT ~700k vs IDB 865k; headcount/FTE, ledger #4). researchers value is in thousands.